A Disappointment, but not a Defeat
2/6/09
Hi all,
We're writing you as co-founders of Coastal Community Watch. Today we received news that the MS Supreme Court overturned two appeals court judgments and decided on behalf of Hancock County in the matter of the C-4 zoning dispute in Bayou Caddy.
To recap, several residents of Clermont Harbor fought this 2005 rezoning because it allowed for unlimited height and density development on tidal marshland near family neighborhoods in the Bayou Caddy area. 800 of you banded together to support the zoning appeal, understanding that unbridled development there will also have a great impact on residents in Bay St. Louis and Waveland. After 31/2 years, it's come to a conclusion.
The decision was 8-1, yet we remain convinced that our arguments were valid - we wouldn't have won twice in the MS Court of Appeals otherwise.
Most of you have been loyal CCW supporters, realizing that our way of life is at stake. Thank you. While the final legal decision is disappointing, it doesn't represent defeat. Here's why:
1. The appeal process gave us time to educate ourselves. Since the storm, we've learned the benefits of careful planning - with the help of some of the best architects and planners in the country. We know that things like traffic feasibility studies and environmental impact reports need to be considered before sweeping zoning decisions are made.
2. We can apply that knowledge in the new Hancock County Comprehensive Plan. The draft offers many better alternatives to the slated C-4 zoning - which is open to "unlimited height and density." And residents of Clermont Harbor, Waveland and Bay St. Louis can demand that studies be performed before any development in the Bayou Caddy area begins.
3. High rise condos have become like Pet Rocks. No one wants them anymore. Meanwhile, low-scale developments that are family and small business oriented are booming in places like Lafayette, LA. The style is called New Urbanism and it's HOT. Hopefully, we can attract that sort of development now - it's much more compatible with Hancock County heritage and lifestyle.
4. Thus far, we've escaped the fiasco of abandoned large-scale projects. In Hancock County's future undertakings, we'll go forward with the knowledge gleaned from other communities along the coast.
5. We've learned that trying to amend decisions is much more difficult than participating in local government all along. As a community, we understand more about how zoning decisions can affect our quality of life. More of us are now active in the public planning process.
What have we learned personally? We've noticed that someone who stands to profit from a zoning change is usually very, very energetic. Those of us who have only something to lose by a zoning change have less ambition. We can't quite imagine what that loss will mean until it happens. That lack of imagination sometimes makes us complacent.
Let's imagine a community where we understand that we ARE the government - the officials are our representatives. Letters to them become important, because we know they'll have an impact. Attending a meeting and speaking up can sway a decision. A phone call to a neighbor can start a chain reaction of participation.
That's the sort of Hancock County we can be proud to call home.
Thank you again for your continuing support of the Coastal Community Watch mission: Increasing community participation in local government.
Ellis Anderson
Lori Gordon

























